header photo

The Analytic Humanist

 smart people helping others


As we shall find is the case with so much of liberalisms policies, the policy on immigration is composed of contradictory narratives by liberal partys. On the one hand we hear that the world is going through global warming. We are told our nations need to reduce their carbon footprint. We need to reduce population pressure on the environment. We need to stop building homes on farmland. We need to reduce populations. We need to reduce resource use. Yet, immigration requires us to add more schools, roads, hospitals, homes and everything else a growing population needs. 

Liberal governments tell us the population is aging, dying, getting sick and leaving the work force. The need for immigrants cannot be overstressed we are told. Liberal governments tell us we need more immigration, more people added to our work force and our cities and towns.

If the stress put on the environment is due to population growth why is a declining population not a good thing? If a declining population cannot be entertained then are we not going to have to reconcile this with the damage population growth brings to the environment? But the real question is if we need immigrants because of an aging population what do we do as these influx ages? Do we increase the population more and more to infinity or to when the carrying capacity of earth is finally exceeded? Regardless of ones position on either issue the reality is at some point there will be too many people on the planet and one way or another the numbers will be reduced, so we have to decide when and how this is going to happen.

The need for immigration is a manufactured need, an artificial need created to support a broader social agenda. The world will not stop spinning the oceans will not dry up if immigration is rejected. Immigration is needed only by Globalists. Economics does not require higher rates of immigration to exist.

Globalism needs immigration to keep resident workforces weak. To keep labour compliant there has to be competition for jobs. At one time unemployment was kept at around 3% but at this rate labour had too much power and the standard of living tended to rise, so unemployment was shifted upwards to the 6 - 7% level using immigration. To keep the unemployment high and labor weak immigration has to be high. 

Conservatives have begun to buy into this thinking as the shift to the left continues. Despite some minor shifting along the political spectrum both Right and Left have come to agree that immigration is required. Both ends of the political spectrum for their own reasons want labor to be kept weak.

The left narrative is centered on social justice. The ideal liberal is the social justice warrior (sjw). The socialist game plan focuses on reforming other peoples behaviouir and attitudes. There is a reason why Christ told us to deal with the beam in our own eye before trying to fix issues with other people. The only person we can successful change is ourselves. However, the left wants to transform the world by transforming the mental make up of others. Men are in liberals cross hairs. Men are the defenders of the church, family and nation state. The ideology of the left is sterile so long as the male retains his central position in society. So the left seeks to remove him. By keeping labour weak the power of the male worker is also limited. By bringing in persons without strong conservative values the role of the man is further compromised. When a culture devalues men they no longer serve as the protectors of family and culture.

Rationalists suggest a total ban on all immigration when unemployment is above 3%.

In conflict zones an association of nations ought to establish safe zones. Woman and children will be accepted and sheltered in these zones. No men of military age will be permitted entry. Men of military age will be formed into battalions, trained and sent to fight for their lands.