header photo

The Analytic Humanist

 smart people helping others

The U.N.

The U.N is a Globalist agency funding the Globalist agenda. It does not support responsible government. Ultimately it will produce a fascist one world state.

​Ecumenics do not need or support social engineering whether locally or on a global scale, we do not support the top down, hierarchial organizations of the globalist hedgemony. Ecumenics believe we the people are the rightful owners of our political jurisdictions. Ecumenics support Grassroots Democracy.

​Support Ecumenics and stop the fascist takeover of the planet. Voice your opposition to these kinds of supra-national  agencies.

​Please do not support  the U.N. by supporting any party or organization that supports, funds or promotes the U.N..


The politics favored by the West is democracy. It is democracy that has often been credited with providing the most developed nations with their culture. Without democracy culture becomes a social service of the State as it is in dictatorships. Democracy is not a simple, one size fits all, concept however. For the most part what is called democracy is technically known as Representative Democracy. The people do not vote directly on legislation but for a representative who acts on their behalf. 

​Representative Democracy has become popular because Direct Democracy can easily devolve into a tyranny of the majority. There is also this possibility with the First Past The Post electoral system rather than a proportional system. However, a Republic is said to provide even more security to the impositions of tyrants, however a Constitution can to some degree serve as a tyranny of the Founding peoples as Constitutional Documents are difficult to alter, once established. Which is partly why some argue a well-written constitution gives the state stability.

Minority rights are not protected in Direct Democracy. In Representative Democracies the elected official is supposed to represent all of his or her constitutents but in reality of course he or she is embedded in a particular culture and mind set and tends to vote for those things that reflect his or her own personal preferences. It does not help that those who elect him or her tend to represent a particular cultural type.

​Depending on the politician and his or her party he or she may or may not respresent the true interests of the members of his or her constitutency. The degree to which his or her votes favor one or more sectors is only to be guessed at.

​There is the need not to anger or isolate ones core supporter so legislation will tend to favor a particular constituency even while giving the vote the appearence of being done for more universalistic reasons.

​What few people understand is the difference integrity makes to how a system works. A tyrant with integrity may well serve the people better than a democratic leader with none. Justin Trudeau was democratically elected but has abandoned any pretence at being a representative of his nation. His concern has been to ensure himself a place in the Globalist world agenda. He is not in any real sense of the term a Canadian leader but a Globalist Puppet acting to put himself in this hstory books as did the elder Trudeau. This explains, at least to some degree his support for Islam. Islam serves a key role in bringing forth the New World Order. The problem is that no one can predict where integrity will be found. Democracy is less a way to ensure good government as it is a way to revoke support for a government that is governing badly. However a lot of damage can be done in four years.

​It is obvious there is a weakness in democracy that is being exploited by liberals. The reliance on the support of a majority keeps a party sensitive to the needs of the people but it is also a call to pander to the common denominator or average voter. This reliance on the popular vote does not reard personal integrity and indeed is more likely to benefit the player, the popularizer, the superficial politician who can play up to the masses. Democracy is susceptible to fascist takeovers or becoming a tyranny of the majority. The tyranny of the majority is still a tyranny even if the tyranny expresses the will of the people. The free world condemns dictatorship because it is said to take away peoples freedom, but this is not absolutely the case. A dictator may have the power to take away peoples freedoms but it is not an essential component of a dictatorship.

​But is not pandering to a majority a good thing so far as democracy is concerned? Is not expressing the will of the people, as expressed in the popular vote, what democracy is all about? Not when the government becomes nothing more than a bread and circuses exhibition. When what sort of bread and circuses the people will get become the deciding factor in an election then democracy is or becomes a farce. When elections become solely fixated on what the majority will get in the way of benefits it becomes increasingly difficult for a responsible party to be elected and more likely the least responsible and least ethical party will win. 

​What of a democratically elected leader who spends a nation into insolvency, as happened in Greece? This is the home of democracy but democracy did not save it and in fact has contributed to its being taken over by a foreign power, the UN. What options are open to the people to take back their power and head the country down a different road?

Grassroots Democracy is a way to express the popular will that elimintes the authoritarian aspects of respresentative democracy. The power necessary to protect minority rights is the same power needed to overthrow the will of the majority. Governments ought not to impose their will on the people not even with the blessing of the majority of voters; less so because of sympathy for a minority. Candidates are voted in to represent the people in a more measureable fashion in a Grassroots Democracy. The mission of Ecumenics is to protect private property rights. We believe the best protection we have against tyranny is to restrict individual power to the limits of the individuals purse. Ecumenic Associations (Exchanges) serve as the main avenue of policy implementation.

​Government ought to function as an administrator of the public weal. Politicians are not called on to be social engineers. Governments are the servants of the people not the boss of the people.

​The real problem with communist governments was not their economics but the fact that they existed as the people' s bosses and performed as social engineers instead of public servants. But how much different are modern governments from the tyrannies of the past, so long as they continue to exercise a social engineering function?

​Ecumenics has a problem with liberals and liberalism. Liberalism cannot survive without the freedom to generate social costs. The only way social costs can be justified is if the end justifies the means. If one cannot justify the means by the ends then social costs are unjustified. The role or purpose of a social agenda to make the end so vital, that whatever means are required to implement the program are justified. The end, by virtue of the agenda, justifies the means. If this kind of thinking is ok with you then you are not paying for anything you have not legitimized. But does this mean that others ought to fund your vision and your values? Ecumenics do not think so and this is why we oppose liberalism. It is why we oppose the creation of social costs and the formation of social agendas and the means used to implement this end, that surely will follow.

​Only Ecumenics have the policies and programs to overcome the social costs of liberalism. Only Ecumenics have the vision to transform politicians from social engineers into administrators and public servants. 

Volunteer today to help defeat liberalism.